Bandhan Bank (Bandhan) reported a Q4FY23 profit after tax (PAT) of `8.08 bn, showing a significant improvement from `2.9 bn in the previous quarter. This growth was primarily driven by a sharp rebound in net interest margins (NIMs) and a notable decrease in provisioning. The annualised return on assets (RoA) for the quarter stood at 2.2%. Although there were higher slippages, the bank witnessed a healthy reduction in its stressed asset portfolio through organic means. It is worth mentioning that when factoring in the anticipated recovery of `17 bn from the Credit Guarantee Fund for Micro Units (CGFMU), with `11 bn expected in Q1FY24 and `6 bn in Q1FY25, the bank’s provision coverage ratio (PCR) stands at approximately 100% for the reported stressed asset pool (non-performing assets + Special Mention Accounts 1 and 2), and around 84% when considering the stress pool inclusive of Special Mention Account 0.
Given that a significant portion of stressed assets has already been recognised and the collection efficiency has improved to over 98%, our modelling assumes slippages at approximately 3.0% for FY24E and FY25E. This is a notable improvement compared to the gross slippages of around 9.5-10% observed in the past two years. We commend the bank for its proactive strategy of creating contingent provisions based on the anticipated recovery from CGFMU. Despite the anticipated pressure on the cost of deposits (CoD) in the future, our model incorporates a 10 bps y-o-y increase in calculated net interest margins due to the lower slippages.
The disbursements in emerging entrepreneurs business (EEB) segment of Bandhan Bank showed a significant pickup, with a 39% q-o-q increase. This indicates a healthy revival, which is further reflected in an approximately 8% q-o-q growth in assets under management (AUM) after three consecutive quarters of decline on a q-o-q basis. The disbursements in the housing segment, however, were impacted by IT system migration, resulting in a 57% q-o-q decline. As a result, the AUM in the housing segment remained relatively flat on a q-o-q basis. However, it appears that the situation has normalised from March-April onwards. The bank has provided guidance of 20% y-o-y AUM growth for FY24, with housing expected to grow by 22-25% and other businesses contributing to the growth, while the EEB segment is guided at 17-18% y-o-y growth.
Unlike peers, the bank has been more impacted by covid-19 due to geographical concentration and higher ticket size though now clearly stands at almost the end of the covid-19 stress cycle. With majority of stress recognition already done and collection efficiency rising to >98%, we are modelling-in slippages at 3% for FY24E/FY25E vs 9.5-10% gross slippages in the last two years.